Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Answers and Clarity
The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.